12/27/2023 0 Comments Invincible compendium open![]() We were able to capitalize on it with Invincible over a decade later, and we had no oversight whatsoever. You would do a book at Image to be able to have that freedom, and it was a structure that was set up by those guys in the early 90s. Creators design their covers, control their logos and logo placement, and oversee every single aspect of their books. Robert Kirkman: Image was founded by creators, so the corporate structure is that the creators make all the decisions. What about working with Image allowed the story to be told in the way you wanted without the restraints and editorial pressure that you may have seen otherwise? I think that really solidified things in fans' minds, like, "Wait a minute, this guy's hanging out with Spider-Man all of a sudden. It was very early on, in the late 20s or so of Invincible, and now we've got official images of our character with Spider-Man, so you can't get a better advertisement for superhero comic than that. It was the same situation again, and that's how I got that League of Losers storyline to happen at the end of the series. It's funny too, because we did that six-issue arc, and then it was going to end around issue 18. That ended up being our first issue back. " Then he went to the powers that be, and we just scrambled. On the phone as a joke, I was like, "I could do a Spider-Man/Invincible team up." He kind of just went, "I wonder if we could do that. We didn't know what we were going to do, so let's just figure out something. It's holding its numbers and actually doing well in trade, so we think we're gonna give you another arc." I was like, "Oh crap." He's like, "You need to write issue 14 fast," but there were no plots and we had nothing approved. I had already turned 13 in, and then Tom called me and was like, "At the end of the day, Marvel Team-Up's actually doing better than some of our other books. Marvel Team-Up was supposed to end at issue 13, because I was able to talk them into letting me do a three-part story at the end. I think it was issue 14 of Marvel Team-Up, and it was very early on in my brief time at Marvel. ![]() Robert Kirkman: To this day, I'm still like, "How does that exist?" I'll see someone show that comic, and I'm just like, "I cannot believe that happened." But I guess I have to give credit to Tom Brevoort. ![]() It was kind of a streamlined version of what everyone wanted for Marvel and DC, so I think that's why it caught on. It was a little less cumbersome than your average Marvel or DC book because there weren't big crossovers and big corporate mandates jumping in and changing the course of the series at times. It all happened in one series, and it was a little bit more bite-sized. It was everything I loved about Marvel and DC books, but with the continuity mattering and everything leading to something else. Things were a little bit more emotional the stakes were a little bit more real the depths mattered. Robert Kirkman: I think that Invincible appealed to the hardcore Marvel and DC fanbase that absolutely love superhero books, but it did things a little bit differently. But never in a million years did I think it actually would. I was really just trying to do something that we'd have fun doing and that hopefully, maybe would catch on. The thought of anything going 12 issues, let alone 144, was insane. In those days, I had never had a book that lasted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |